Parental Guidance Advised

In Ontario, the Film Review Board has a choice of five ratings which they can apply to a movie. The first, General, is for material suitable for all ages and considered inoffensive in the seven categories on which it judges: sutiable age, language, nudity, sexual activity, violence, horror,
and psychological impact. The second rating, Parental Guidance Advised, is applied to movies with some content in these categories that might concern a parent, but not necessarily. The third rating requires that children under 14 be accompanied by an adult to view the film, the fourth that any child under 18 be accompanied by an adult, and the fifth rating, Restricted, does not allow for viewing by persons under the age of 18. The rating system is designed to be flexible for practical application, yet reflect community standards.Community standards. The real world stuff. The messy, complicated business of deciding what is appropriate and who gets to do the deciding. Because let's face it, not everyone in a community, even a relatively homogeneous community, is going to have the same standards. I've been reading bits and pieces about this around our community of mama bloggers for a while. Izzy taking stands on Bratz, training bras for the very young, and toddler-level placement of questionable magazines. Jenny being grossed out by Baby Bratz and their Big Banana (no, I'm not joking). Mary P calling out MyScene Barbie as a Skank. GGC talking about how this stuff may offend us, anger us, and disgust us, but that we can't and shouldn't hide it from our kids. HBM shaking down Gloria Steinem for an answer on how to reconcile two different desires for our kids: we want them to have a healthy approach to sexuality, yet to keep them from being overly influenced by all the over-sexualized images in the media.
For me, it comes down to the words of the film board: Parental Guidance Advised. Let's face it,
pretty much the entire world has that sticker implicitly on it. Even a sweet family walk in the park comes with all those things you need to teach your kids: not to eat dog poop, not to run in the street, wait your turn on the slides and swings, don't throw the sand. We teach them to climb the ladders in the park safely, helping them work out where they need to put their hands and feet so they can scale great heights without suffering personal injury. We wouldn't think to do otherwise.And they get older, their world wider, the dangers more nebulous. But our job doesn't change. Even as films become more risque, the film board ratings allow for children to attend if accompanied by an adult. Meaning that they recognize a parent's right to make up their own mind about whether the material is appropriate viewing for their young. Meaning the onus is on the adult to be just that. To be responsible, to be the adult, to parent. And to explain or discuss anything that they might find problematic. For that is our job. To provide guidance. Parental Guidance.
The ratings even provide age suggestions, in recognition that maybe at 13, a kid might still need some reassurance or have some questions, while at 16, they are more likely to be able to handle it all on their own. There is another step for age 18, as well. Because yes, they are also recognizing - as I think we do as well - that a child's ability to understand and process and parse their viewing with their ingrained values grows with their age in most cases. This too is a case of parental judgment - in viewing material, but also in toys, in books, in experiences. In the library we have a teen section nestled between adult reading and children's. The children in grade 4 to 6, say, might well be able to read the books in the teen section and even comprehend, but they often deal with much heavier issues or have much scarier content. We don't prevent them from taking those, but we recommend stuff from the upper end of children's, stuff designed for them, books that can have heavy issues too, that have good, complex plots and language, but that are written to respect a child's emotional abilities. Toys, too, may be perfectly great at one age, but may be questionable at a younger age. What that age is, what your child should play with when? Comes back to Parental Guidance. What you allow is another way you teach your child what you think is acceptable. And hopefully, you take the oppportunity and the moment of time to tell them why rather than merely making it The Forbidden.

So will I buy my daughter Bratz dolls? No. Will I refuse to let her play at the house of anyone who owns one or go down the aisle in the toystore where they are shelved? No. I will use the opportunity for Parental Guidance. I will explain why I won't buy her one, what I dislike about them. What a perfect opportunity to tell her about some of my values, about things I think are important and things I think are distasteful or inappropriate or even scary and dangerous.
I have enormous dislike for the whole Disney princess oeuvre. She hasn't seen any of it yet. If
she comes to notice the whole thing? It will be a great opportunity for me to explain why I don't like it. I will tell her that yes, it's okay for her to watch it and like it, but that I think it's important for her to understand that that is only one facet of what it is to be a girl and to have dreams. Dreams should also include things you want to do for yourself, accomplishments that will make you proud, places you'd like to go, the person you'd like to be. And also? Dreams are not plans. Dreams are not solid, not things on which to base real life. They are perfectly fine for stories and fun, though. Indeed, I will read her fairy tales, too. I'd hate for her to miss out on dreaming, on the magic of a good tale, on all the deeply rooted cultural referencing therein, just because the Disney Corp. got hold of them. And then I can talk with her about what we read. (which - hey, dialogic reading! - both helps her reading and comprehension skills develop and provides for me the chance to pass on more of what I think.)You notice something? I'm talking a lot about passing on your values. I'm not talking about Family Values with capitals. I'm talking about my values. That is part of Parental Guidance. To give them guidelines. Guidelines, in my opinion, work better than a million Rules. Rules are about the letter, guidelines about the spirit. Values and guidelines are, in my mind, firmly entwined when it comes to parenting, and are one of the major things that we need to pass on to our kids, instill in them early and consistently. They run deeper than Rules, allow for a bit of flex (let's face it, there isn't a Rule for every situation and sometimes flex is needed to allow for times when you need to bend one place to keep something more important intact), but still provide some boundaries, a compass for making good choices. Somewhat like the film board's guidelines: flexible for practical application, yet reflecting the community (in this case family) standards.
You'll notice also that I'm not talking about what those values should be.
Because that's not what I'm on about here. I don't expect people to have the same values. Some parents are more permissive than others in some areas, some more conservative on other issues. I am not about telling people how to parent their children, but I hope that they do parent them. I myself would be the subject of shock and horror in some areas because I place no emphasis on religion. That doesn't make me a bad parent. Because I place great value on being a kind, thoughtful, and respectful person and I impress upon my daughter that I expect the same of her. And it's not just about talking, either.As Gloria Steinem said in her response regarding sexuality and sexism, we model what we expect, we teach by example. So when Izzy writes to Target to complain about padded bras in size 6X, when she asks the store manager to make magazines with unleashed cleavage less prominent, she is teaching her children by example that she doesn't think these things are okay. When HBM finds a group of smart women she likes and rallies up a community and even entices a bunch of us away from our computers to form real-life frienships and community, she shows her daughter how highly she prizes the company of other intelligent, interesting women, how she values friendship. When Jenny disses Bratz and refuses to buy one for her daughter, she lets her know that she finds them inappropriate and distasteful as toys for her child's age. When Mary P starts a letter-writing campaign about nasty Barbies, she tells the company and her children (grown though they might be) that she thinks they are ging too far. And when GGC lets her son see these things, she also lets him see that she understands how unappealing, confusing, even disturbing the world can be, but that she trusts in him and the values she will give him as tools to help sort his way through it. She will be there to talk with him and help him do that, too, for even with all this modelling going on, communicating with words does remain crucial. So these women? They are all, each in their own way, demonstrating and teaching their own values to their children. And I applaud that heartily.
In short: Parental Guidance is more than Advised. It is necessary. In our times, in any times. It is our job. As parents.
Labels: parenting dilemmas







18 Comments:
Kittenpie - Great, and insightful post! I was drawn here after seeing you smart comments on other blogs. Looking forward to more good reading. :)
Fantastic post. Thank you for writing it and being ever insightful.
Part of the fear we parents have of all the media influences you've identified is the effect they'll have on our children's peer group. Yes, we can convey our values to our own kids, but how much will that help in the long run if they are surrounded by a peer group who have been raised to believe that babies' bottles should be attached with a chain-link garter?
That fear is especially potent when it comes to violence. I see the Bub as such a gentle child, and do my best to teach him gentleness and deference. And yet I know that there are many parents who feel it's more important to teach assertiveness, go-get-it-iveness. How will Bub fare when thrown into the deep end with kids whose parents reward them for pushing and shoving to get what they want? (I know already how he'll fare - he'll back off immediately, unless it's his sister, in which case he's already learned to restrain his impulse to push and cries out "No no no!" instead.)
For that reason, I was encouraged by an article in the newspaper this morning on bullying - it showed that children who felt loved and accepted at home were much more likely to handle instances of bullying constructively, getting help when they need it (and were, as a result, less likely to be bullied). It's good to have faith that the parenting practices you've described really can protect our children, even from their own peers.
Every word perfect.
Wow. Perfectly written. Insightful. Open-minded.
Yes, yes, yes.
Oh and I plan on letting Hailey watch the Bratz cartoon just so that we can laugh at it and use it as a tool to talk about what "hoochy" looks like. If she doesn't hear it from me then she'll be hearing it from the girls in 6th grade who will be convincing her to wear the "I'm a good girl looking for a bad boy" t-shirt. And seriously, I saw a 12 year old wearing one of those the weekend. I wanted to vomit.
Just checkin' in to say "hi!" and good job on this post. There are thoughts floating around in my head that I'd like to share but I don't think they'd really add to what you wrote.
so well put.
I agree totally.
I am going to get really unpopular now....
I never thought I would let my girls have Bratz, Barbies or refined sugar. They have them all. In abundance.
Maybe I am weak, or maybe I have chosen to fight bigger battles than dollies. Because I do have bigger battles as they get older.
I would and I am sure WILL fight padded bras and my girls wearing belly exposing shirts until hell freezes over.
But, as much as I do not like how those dollies look, I know my girls see them just as...dollies.
ah yes, the infamous whore barbie...
http://www.alimartell.com/?p=1321
This was great; I can't really add anything to it. You hit it spot on in, I think, the first paragraph where you made the point that as PARENTS the onus is on US. Period. The end.
I will say, in response to Bub and Pie's comments, that I have similar concerns about the peer group's influence overshadowing the parent's influence. However, I was encouraged to see the mention about the recent research regarding bullying, and it confirms your statements even more.
BRA.VO.
Couldn't have said it better - it is ALL about us, about creating happy, loving, supportive, positive home-worlds for our children to grow up in.
YES.
I don't think I have ever agreed more enthusiastically with anything you have written. Yes. Yes. Yes. In fact I had a similar (though far less well explained) conversation with someone about this last week.
Well done Kittenpie!
Great post! Love how it relates to community. And Crazymumma, one of the lovely things about a community is that we won't always agree or have identical opinions on issues. And that is okay.
Community with a bunch of clones ain't much in the way of a community. When I think of community I imagine a small town where you run into everyone quite regularly. And have to get along with them as well.
So Crazymumma, I might right now think I won't do Bratz and refined sugar - hey, Monkeygirl is 10 months old and it isn't that difficult to do so. Who knows what I may or may not do in a year or 5 or 10. This is all new to me.
Crazymumma -
hey, as I said in the post, I don't expect everyone to like or care about the same things. Different people have different priorities, and I don't mean that any are better than any others.
For me, I'm thinking okay to Barbies but no to Bratz because I think they go too far and there's lots of other dollies. But again, as I mentioned, I sure won't go preventing her from playing with someone who does have them - I don't go in for trying to enforce my thinking on the rest of the world. She'll see them somewhere anyhow.
Wow, your post made me want to get up an do something! Although, being a good example is more "being" than "doing"...or is it? My brain hurts. You made me feel like I was watching the Les Miserables when they sing "Will you join in our crusade?" And that's a good think. A very good thing.
Here, here. I know this approach will work in the end. I just hope that it works along the way. I have a good friend right now who is engaged in a ferocious battle with her teenage son over violent video games. She is a fabulous woman who has guided her children wisely all along but teens are teens. I do know this kid will come round and mature into his own system of values. In the meantime, the fire storm in that house is downright scary.
Thanks for this post. It was lovely to read.
Great post! It doesn't stop at 18, either, when they may be legally adults, and certainly they think they're adults - but they're so not adults. Still much sorting through of values, still much determining who they are, and who they want to be yet to happen. Parents Guide through that, too.
(Interestingly, Crazymumma, I never allowed my children Barbies (Bratz weren't an issue then), choosing Groovy Girls and their ilk instead. However, my teenage daughters absolutely do wear belly tops. But perhaps your concern was belly tops on a pre-teen?)
In fact, sometimes my girls wear things I don't like. Do I tell them "Go upstairs and don't come down till you're dressed decently?" No. I think Parental Guidance takes a different form in the teens. Instead of orders, I talk to them about the fact that clothing is symbolic and tells people about yourself, and suggest some of the things that particular outfit is telling people. Then I leave it up to them. (Unless we're going to visit grandma, in which case it's "You can't wear THAT!" Because there's a time and a place for everything... LOL)
I second your perfect post award. Applauding loudly.
Post a Comment
<< Home